This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 317–332, doi:10.3762/bjnano.15.29
Figure 1: Comparison of cumulative distribution curves measured by three different manufacturers using three ...
Figure 2: spICP-MS of pre-dispersed (562 J/mL ultrasonic treatment prepared one day before measurement) and s...
Figure 3: SEM top-view image; in-lens SE detector, resolution: 0.99 nm/pixel, field of view (full image): 2.5...
Figure 4: TEM image; 2048 × 2048 pixel CCD, resolution: 0.96 nm/pixel, field of view (full image): 2 μm × 2 μ...
Figure 5: SEM cross-section image; PDBSE detector, resolution: 3.3 nm/pixel, field of view (full image): 8.5 ...
Figure 6: Comparison of electron microscopy results obtained by the TiO2 manufacturers (M1–M3) and the extern...
Figure 7: Comparison of SSA calculated from particle size distribution with SSA measured by BET.
Figure 8: Relation of measured SSA values and SSA values calculated from EM MinFeret and ECD particle size me...
Figure 9: CIE L* and CIE b* values of different TiO2 pigment samples as a function of the D50n MinFeret diame...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1815–1822, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.192
Figure 1: Schematic view of five different projections of one agglomerate found in KRONOS 2360, reproduced fr...
Figure 2: Imaging conditions and image post-processing for pigment sizing for a rutile pigment; a) original i...
Figure 3: Visualisation of the systematic challenges in the detection of sectioned particles; a) principal po...